🔗 Share this article

Only two days before the New York race for mayor, Michael Lange made a bold electoral prediction – going beyond the winner citywide, but block by block. Lange, an expert in elections who grew up in New York City, has spent over a decade in progressive politics and emerged as a kind of local celebrity recently for his thorough analyses into city data and polling.

He published his highly detailed forecast map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate was victorious while failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his Substack, the Narrative War. Lange has a flair for witty coinages. He pointed out, as an example, the split between the “commie corridor”, stretching from Park Slope to Bushwick to a third locale, where he forecasted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal surpass the New York Times” in audience and most voters leaned toward Cuomo, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Patterns and Surprises

What was your election night?

I had to do that because they were adding approximately 200K votes into the system every few minutes! I felt somewhat anxious at the beginning: The candidate was ahead the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but came large groups of votes added later and his lead dropped from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

Understand, there was a world where election day turned out somewhat badly for him, in which Cuomo would have basically doubling his votes from the earlier contest. However Mamdani gained half a million votes to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He went out and massively expanded his base from the primary.

Coalition Building

Where did the mayor-elect get additional support from?

He assembled the coalition that the left long aimed for: diverse racially, it’s young, tenants and individuals facing cost pressures. He improved significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the earlier election. Plus he further maximized his core of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He built the alliance that the left long aimed for: multiracial, youthful, renters and people squeezed by affordability

There were also some supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a real thing, confined to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Muslims. Electors in immigrant strongholds that went for Trump previously went for Zohran now. However I wouldn’t say he was gaining white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Impact

One of the big stories of the night was the record participation. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Participation was much greater than I had expected. I figured we might exceed 2 million, but it reached 2.3 million – that is a huge number of participants. Existed a decent anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that was enough to secure victory.

You predicted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Right now you would say he’s favored to get over 50%. He has 50.4% but there’s still probably 200K ballots uncounted as of Wednesday morning. Thus I don’t think it’s definitive, but I think it’s likely, and I hope he does so afterwards none can claim the Republican was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His vote completely collapsed.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any area. Not even one neighborhood in the borough, similar to an highly conservative area. That truly was unexpected. Cuomo held very white areas, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and plus gained all of these Republicans on the island who had a strong turnout. I think occurred significant strategic balloting by GOP voters. They were doing it before the former president tweeted his support for the candidate, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide unless the winning alliance failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your much mentioned “commie corridor” – was support for the candidate dominant in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view existed some weakening of the progressive zone in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, for example, the property owners and homeowners all went for Cuomo. Thus there existed a little resistance. But no, mostly the leftist base is another huge reason why Zohran won – he scored between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the vote there was coverage on whether the candidate was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he did?

Exist areas with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. However in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance was influential in those places. Similarly in the moderate communities like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned Cuomo. And also, you have newcomers from the former Soviet Union in the borough, they were strongly Cuomo. So I don’t know if existed crazy narrative-busters here, but he did hold left-leaning areas and even parts of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what New York means politically? Will the progressive base serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest political leaders from progressives come from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I’m sure that there will be additional examples – candidates will come from these areas to be elevated nationally.

But I believe that each urban center in the US could develop similar progressive hubs. Cities are the centers of leftwing power in the nation – because youth reside there, people rent and they are places where people are crushed by the disparities we face.