🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “total contradiction” for opposing anti-smoking regulations in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

Campaign in Zambia

Documents seen by journalists originating from the corporation's branch in Zambia to the African officials requests plans to ban tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be abandoned or delayed.

The corporation is pursuing changes to a draft bill that include lowering the proposed size of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on scented cigarette varieties, and watered-down penalties for any firms breaking the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“If I was a politician, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” stated the health advocate.

Over seven thousand citizens a year die from tobacco-related illnesses, according to global health agency statistics.

Chimbala said the letter was known to have been circulated to various ministerial offices and was in circulating through public interest organizations.

International corporate influence worries

It comes amid broader worries about business sector influence with medical guidelines. Last month, WHO officials raised concerns that the cigarette manufacturers was increasing attempts to undermine international regulations.

“There is proof of industry lobbying everywhere. Corporate signatures are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN high-level meeting,” said Jorge Alday.

Possible outcomes

“When public health regulation fails to be approved because of this letter, the price could be paid in individuals' health who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The public health measure progressing through Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and requiring that visual health alerts cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

In the letter, the company recommends this be reduced to less than half “following international recommended threshold”, delayed for at least twelve months after the law is enacted.

Global health authorities specifically advises a alert needs to encompass at least fifty percent of the cigarette package face “and attempt to encompass as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings must cover sixty-five percent of a product container sides.

Scented product controversy

The corporation requests the withdrawal of extensive controls on flavored cigarette varieties, suggesting that it would push consumers toward “black market” products. It suggests banning a limited selection of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The draft bill proposes sanctions for multiple violations “extending from a portion of yearly revenue to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Company justification

In the letter, the managing director of the Zambian branch claims the firm is “committed to ethical business practices” and “backs the goals of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the associated health impact” but maintains that “certain measures can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Activist reaction

The advocate stated BAT’s proposed changes would “dilute these regulations so much that the required influence for it to cause long-term change in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that numerous similar measures existed in the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he said.

“We exist in a international community. If I plant tobacco in my back yard and collect the yield and sell it out – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my neighbor's family uses … to enrich myself and all the future family lines while my neighbor's family are perishing … is in itself complete moral failure.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the UK or elsewhere had not resulted in corporate closures, the advocate mentioned. “Regulations don't close the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Official corporate statement

A BAT Zambia spokesperson stated: “BAT Zambia conducts its activities following with relevant national regulations. Additionally, the corporation engages in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the suitable systems which allow for relevant group engagement in regulation development.”

The firm positioned itself as “not resisting legislation”, they said, mentioning that young individuals should be protected from acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We support progressive regulation to accomplish desired public health goals, while recognizing the range of privileges and responsibilities on businesses, users and involved parties,” the spokesperson stated, mentioning that the corporation's recommendations “mirror the circumstances of the African nation's economy and smoking product business, which involves rising levels of black market activity”.

The nation's ministry of business, commercial affairs and industrial development was approached for comment.