🔗 Share this article

Iran is willing to restart nuclear negotiations with the United States on condition that it is approached with "dignity" and "honor", Iran's foreign minister has declared.

The Iranian diplomat declared only diplomacy produced results, and revealed recent overtures had been made by intermediaries to resume talks with the American leadership. He claimed Iran possessed no unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran was not yet able to allow the International Atomic Energy Agency to inspect struck enrichment centers for safety concerns.

Walking a Complex Route

The foreign minister is treading a challenging course since Iran does not want be seen to be operating from a stance of vulnerability, and he emphatically stated that Iran had arisen more resilient defensively and mentally from the joint assault on its atomic facilities in June.

He was talking at a security conference in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an inalienable right to refine atomic fuel within its borders that it will perpetually retain" – the primary cause of the impasse in the previous talks.

Prior Talks Suddenly Ended

The earlier sessions of talks between the United States and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and acrimonious end on 12 June when the Israeli government, with US support, struck Iranian nuclear sites in a two-week conflict that culminated with the US president claiming the locations had been destroyed. Following this, European countries exercised their authority to reimpose international penalties, but Iran insists they have not had a substantial consequence.

Perfect Agreement Proposed

Iran's diplomats stated they felt they had reached a "ideal resolution" to the uranium processing matter in previous talks, when it was agreed an Iran-based consortium with American involvement could process nuclear material. The two nations would have been able to assert triumph since local refinement would have remained and the US could be confident that Iran's nuclear programme was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been settled in the negotiations that Washington's technical specialists could function inside Iran, but that was a natural consequence of the partnership suggestion. Officials stated repeatedly they had achieved a deal with the US representative Steve Witkoff only for the deal to fall apart due to "opponents in the US".

Existing Situation

Iran's diplomats stated the cooperative arrangement was now no longer available, but it seems very probable the proposal could be reintroduced in certain ways if talks resume.

The American leader recently claimed he had been getting signals that Iran wanted to reopen negotiations, but privately Tehran representatives claim they are not yet receiving consistent overtures from Washington either explicitly or from significant local go-betweens, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been accused of passivity in the wake of the US president's straightforward manner, but Iran says diplomacy is not part of a spectacle.

Diplomatic Stance

In his address to the gathering, intended to portray the US as a dominant force that misuses the concept of international law, the foreign minister said the 12-day war revealed the dispute could not be settled by military means. He stated the attacks started with a Washington's ultimatum for an total Iran submission and culminated with an absolute demand for a ceasefire.

Iran is convinced the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were carried out with complete American awareness and collaboration, making trust challenging to restore.

Diplomacy Remains the Ultimate Answer

Araghchi stated: "It was not Iran that had abandoned dialogue; it was America and the European states that had always tried to dictate their desires during the talks. Negotiations can still be active and continues the primary answer to resolve disagreements, but its standards, guidelines and tenets must be adhered to."

"Provided that they talk to the nation of Iran with the tone of dignity and honor, they will obtain a response in the identical language."

Repair and Recovery

In what is portrayed by Iran's diplomats as the battle of repair and recovery, the foreign minister claimed he was confident Iran's defence capabilities "are much stronger than before 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been reestablished. We learned many lessons from this war; we have come to know our personal limitations and the weaknesses of the opponent."

He stated: "We managed to survive this engagement. Our atomic expertise, which they intended to obliterate, continues to exist. The sites and machinery, if eliminated, will be restored; what is important is the will of the Iranian people and then the national cohesion that they targeted, but did not succeed to shatter. The Iranian people have grown more powerful, more united, and more backing of the leadership and the country in the aftermath of this attack."